The NORM Transport Plan and Packaging Duties in Qatar
October 17, 2026
12 min read
DITEC Experts, Radiation Protection Team, ALDuha Institute for Training and Environmental Consulting

The short answer: three duties written down
Three duties in article 9 of the rules attached to Decision 45 of 2013 are about paper and preparation rather than about readings. Wrap the ends of contaminated pipes. Write a detailed transport plan that includes the steps taken in an emergency, and present it to the Ministry of Environment for its approval. And before dispatching natural radioactive materials, notify the party that will receive them. NORM is naturally occurring radioactive material, which the rules describe as material in which the concentration of radionuclides is increased as a result of human activity.
The plan duty is addressed to the licensee, and it is tied to transport in any vehicle. The vehicle is a defined word in the rules, covering the means of land transport, including agricultural tractors, trailers and railway wagons. So the duty is not one that appears only for large or unusual shipments in the wording of the clause.
The direction of the plan duty matters, so we say it in plain words. The licensee writes the plan and submits it to the Ministry for approval. The clause places the writing on the licensee, and the Ministry's place in the clause is the approval, not the drafting of the document. Reading that sentence backwards turns a duty on the operator into a wait for a document from the regulator.
This page is for the licence holder's representative, the person who writes the plan, and the workshop supervisor whose men cut and cap the contaminated pipe before it leaves.
The three clauses, term by term
Clause 2 starts narrow and widens. The ends of contaminated pipes must be wrapped to prevent the spread of radioactive materials. Then if they are large in size, such as valves and pumps, they must be wrapped completely, with all necessary precautions taken against the spread of contaminants, and closed flanges used.
So the clause names a purpose, preventing spread, and then names a means, closed flanges, for the large items. Valves and pumps are given as examples of items that are large in size, and the clause does not give a dimension or a weight for largeness.
Clause 5 holds four things in one sentence: a licensee, transport in any vehicle, a detailed written plan including the steps taken in an emergency, and presentation of that plan to the Ministry of Environment for its approval. The clause requires the plan to be written, so a practice carried in the heads of experienced drivers is not what it asks for.
Clause 10 is one line: before dispatching natural radioactive materials, the party that will receive them is to be notified. The timing is in the clause, before dispatch. The form of the notification, how long before, and what it must contain are not in the clause, and we do not supply them.
One more thing worth knowing before writing any plan: what transport means in this decision. The definitions article defines it as all operations and conditions associated with or contributing to the movement of radioactive materials, and the list it then gives is wide. That width is the subject of the worked case below.
Is the plan for each shipment or for the activity?
The clause ties the duty to the licensee and to transport in any vehicle, and does not say one plan per consignment or one plan for the operation. We do not decide it by reading. It is a point we find open in the text and do not fill ourselves; until the competent authority states otherwise, a plan that names the routes and the materials it covers is the safer document.
What the clauses leave to you, and what they do not
A reader looking for an exemption in these three clauses will not find one. There is no size below which the wrapping duty stops, no shipment small enough to travel without the plan in the wording of clause 5, and no recipient exempt from notification in clause 10.
Where the exemption question does live is article 5 with Annex 1, which is about activity levels and about the application of the regulations in force to waste. That is a different question from how a movement is prepared, and we keep the two apart rather than read a level in the annex as permission to skip a written plan.
One row of that annex we do not build on at all. The soil and sludge row carries two units inside one sentence for two depths, and they are not equivalent; the surface contamination limits page sets out the discrepancy. We render it as it stands; we have recorded the discrepancy; and no duty on this page rests on it.
And a boundary on our own reading. Conditioning has its own definition in the rules, as the set of operations that turn radioactive waste into a form suitable for transport, storage or disposal. We mention it because the transport definition names it, not because clause 5 imposes a conditioning step.
Does an approved plan mean the shipment is approved?
That is not something we read in the clause, and it is not something we would promise either way. The clause says the plan is presented for approval and stops there. We make no undertaking about what any approval covers or how long it takes.
The three duties in four rows
The table separates who owes each duty from when it falls due, because the plan and the notification are owed at different moments and by different signatures in practice.
Why is the licensee named in one clause only?
That is what the wording does: clause 5 names the licensee, and clauses 2 and 10 are written as duties without naming the person who owes them. We report the difference and do not assign the other two to the licensee by inference.
Who owes what, and when
| Clause | The duty | Named as owed by | When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 9, clause 2, first part | Wrap the ends of contaminated pipes to prevent spread | Not named in the clause | In preparation, before movement |
| Article 9, clause 2, second part | Large items wrapped completely, with closed flanges | Not named in the clause | In preparation, before movement |
| Article 9, clause 5 | A detailed written transport plan including emergency steps, presented for approval | The licensee | On transport in any vehicle |
| Article 9, clause 10 | Notify the party that will receive the materials | Not named in the clause | Before dispatch |
Counting what a transport plan has to reach
Most transport plans we are shown cover the drive. Count what the decision means by transport, and the gap shows up as a number.
The definitions article opens the term wide, covering all operations and conditions associated with or contributing to the movement of radioactive materials. It then brings a list in under a verb of inclusion. That verb matters: we read the list as illustrating the term rather than closing it, and that reading is ours.
The named operations in that list are eleven. Four of them are about the packaging itself: its design, its manufacture, its maintenance and its repair. Then seven more: conditioning the radioactive materials or the packages, dispatching them, loading them, carrying them, storing them in transit situations, unloading them, and receiving them in the final form.
Now take a typical plan: it names loading, carrying on the road, and unloading at the receiving yard. That is three of the eleven named operations. The eight it does not reach include every one of the four packaging operations, conditioning, dispatch, storage in transit and receipt in the final form.
Three out of eleven is the measurement, and it is a measurement against the definition's list, not against a checklist of ours. We do not say that the clause requires eleven chapters in your plan. We say that the term the clause uses is defined this widely, and that a plan silent on packaging maintenance is silent about something the definition names.
The emergency half of the clause is the part most often thin. Steps taken in an emergency means named steps: who is called first and on which number held by the company, where the spill kit is on the vehicle, how the area is kept, and who surveys before anyone touches the load. And the protection steps themselves: stand on the side the wind comes from, cover the spill so it does not dry and lift, no dry sweeping, respiratory protection for whoever approaches, a survey of boots, gloves and tyres before anyone leaves the area, and a record of each responder's time and dose. A line saying the driver will inform the office is not a step.
Route changes are a second open point. The clause does not say whether a changed destination needs the plan presented again. We leave that open rather than answer it, and we write the covered routes into the plan so that a change is visible as a change.
As for who does this, writing the plan, cutting and capping the pipes, and sending the notification fall to the licensee's people and its contractors. So the licensee's representative signs the plan and keeps the submission record, and the workshop supervisor records the flanges used. We train on writing that plan and are consulted about it, and we do not submit it for you.
Plan questions we are asked
How long does approval of the plan take?
Not stated in the clause, and we make no promise about it. The clause says the plan is presented to the Ministry of Environment for its approval and stops. How long any application takes is not something we undertake, and the decision belongs to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Radiation Protection Department.
May the load move while approval is pending?
The clause does not answer that, and we will not answer it for you. It is a point we find open in the text. What we can say is that the clause puts the presentation of the plan in the same sentence as transport in any vehicle.
Is an email to the receiving yard enough as notification?
The clause requires notification before dispatch and does not prescribe a form. So a written message that can be produced later is the sensible choice, and keeping it with the shipment record is a practice we advise. We do not claim the clause requires a particular form.
Do closed flanges apply to a pipe spool as well as to a pump?
The clause names valves and pumps as examples of items that are large in size, and asks for complete wrapping, all necessary precautions and closed flanges for that case. A long spool with open ends is the plain case for capping, and whether it counts as large in size is a judgement on the item in front of you. Our advice is to cap it either way.
Our plan is three pages. Is that detailed?
Length is not the test. The test we would apply is whether a driver and a yard supervisor could act from it at two in the morning without calling anyone to explain it, and whether the emergency steps in it are steps rather than intentions. Three pages that pass that test are detailed; thirty that fail it are not.
Notes for the person writing the plan
Write the plan from the definition of transport, not from the route map. The definition names packaging design, manufacture, maintenance and repair among the operations, and a plan that begins at the loading bay has already skipped them.
Name people by role, never by personal number. A plan that carries one engineer's mobile number fails on the night that engineer leaves the company, and it puts a private number into a document that circulates. Use the role and the company line.
Keep the emergency steps on one page that can be reached without opening the whole plan, and put a copy in the vehicle. A plan in an office drawer is a document, not a response.
Cap the pipe before it leaves the pipe rack, not at the gate. Cutting and capping raises dust and makes contact unavoidable, so that task belongs where the gloves, the suit, the respiratory protection and a hand survey already are. Cut cold, with a saw or a pipe cutter, never with a flame, an arc or a grinder. Heat makes the scale airborne, and lead 210 and polonium 210, which the definitions article names for the gas industry, volatilise when heated. Damp and contain the cutting point, and survey the end after capping, before it leaves the workshop.
Record the notification, not just the intention to notify. Keep the message, its time and the name of the role that received it with the shipment file, because the clause ties the duty to a moment in time, and a moment can only be shown afterwards by a dated record.
So the plan is a working document written from a defined term, with named steps and roles in it, and kept where the work happens. That is all this page asks for.
How DITEC helps, and where its work stops
On this page the question we are asked is almost always what a detailed plan has to contain. We train on writing it from the definition of transport and on drafting emergency steps that name roles, and we are consulted on the submission record.
ALDuha Institute for Training and Environmental Consulting (DITEC) works in training and consulting. The Institute does not run a laboratory analysis service, does not calibrate instruments, and does not test equipment. Field survey work is arranged through specialist partners.
Our training is licensed. Nothing here is an undertaking that a licence will be issued, and nothing here promises how long any application takes. The decision rests with the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Radiation Protection Department.
Reference: DITEC Experts and the Radiation Protection team. This page is an introductory explanation of a published decision and is not a legal opinion.
Quick Actions
Radiation protection programmes for NORM in oil and gasRequest a radiation protection consultationIn this article
Related Blog
Explore more articles in NORM & Oil & Gas

October 17, 2026
The NORM Transport Factor and Warning Labels in Qatar
Clause 7 and clause 11 of article 9 of Decision 45 of 2013: setting the transport factor for each drum in Qatar, and the labels and statement that travel with it.
Read more
October 17, 2026
NORM Transport Surface Contamination Limits in Qatar
Clause 1 and clause 6 of article 9 of Decision 45 of 2013: the loose surface contamination figures for NORM transport in Qatar, and the package surface radiation level.
Read more
October 17, 2026
Exclusive-Use Vehicles and Sea Transport of NORM in Qatar
Clauses 3, 4, 8 and 9 of article 9 of Decision 45 of 2013 in Qatar: exclusive-use vehicles, the no-mixed-load rule, sea containers, and loads off offshore platforms.
Read more